Larry Jones writes:
>
>Stephen Rasku writes:
>>
>> If forcing revision numbers is a bad idea why don't we disable the
>> functionality?
>
>Because, despite our fascist tendencies, we understand that there
are,
>on very rare occasions, good reasons for breaking the rules.
>
Do you have an example?
In other areas of CVS we enforce certain rules "that are not a good
idea". For example, by default, you can't commit as root. You can
compile it to do it if you want but by default it is off.
I suggest we do the same for this revision setting "feature". If
people want to use it, they can #define the appropriate macro.
However, it would be off by default.
--
Stephen Rasku E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Software Engineer Web: http://www.pop-star.net/
TGI Technologies
_______________________________________________
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
