Larry Jones wrote:
>Stephen Rasku writes:
>>
>> The code in question doesn't get tested that much anyways since you
>> aren't supposed to use it.
>
>Not true -- the test suite (which we run every night on a bunch of
>different platforms) tests it. Unfortunately, the one test that
would
>have detected the reported bug had been perverted to check for the
buggy
>behavior (it noted it as a bug but did not have a prominent FIXCVS
>comment to indicate that it needed to be fixed).
>
Is the test suite is fixed now?
--
Stephen Rasku E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Software Engineer Web: http://www.pop-star.net/
TGI Technologies
_______________________________________________
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
