Not exactly. If a solution like this were to go into GLIBC, then it
becomes much more likely that it can be shared with GNULIB, which means
that the infrastructure for it is already in CVS and that supporting it
won't rely exclusively on the extremely small and overworked CVS team. If this is what it takes for you to fix the bug, I will do this. _______________________________________________ Bug-cvs mailing list Bug-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
