Richard M. Stallman wrote: > Not exactly. If a solution like this were to go into GLIBC, then it > becomes much more likely that it can be shared with GNULIB, which means > that the infrastructure for it is already in CVS and that supporting it > won't rely exclusively on the extremely small and overworked CVS team. > >If this is what it takes for you to fix the bug, I will do this. > >
If you can get this done, great! I think it is the most complete way to fix this bug since it also handles future (currently unknown and arguably broken) tools that also set shared file descriptors to a non-blocking status, as well as making the stdio-always-blocks-and-no-data-sent-will-be-lost functionality available to other applications that may need it. Regards, Derek _______________________________________________ Bug-cvs mailing list Bug-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
