Hello Rosen.
Next time, please, ask before sending such a long but trivial patch. I
do not plan to replace 0 with NULL because, as Bjarne Stroustrup
explained it in "The C++ programming language":
"In C, it has been popular to define a macro NULL to represent the zero
pointer. Because of C++'s tighter type checking, the use of plain 0,
rather than any suggested NULL macro, leads to fewer problems."
Best regards,
Antonio.
_______________________________________________
Bug-ddrescue mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-ddrescue
