On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 9:51 AM Antonio Diaz Diaz <anto...@gnu.org> wrote: > > Hello Rosen. > > Next time, please, ask before sending such a long but trivial patch. I > do not plan to replace 0 with NULL because, as Bjarne Stroustrup > explained it in "The C++ programming language": > > "In C, it has been popular to define a macro NULL to represent the zero > pointer. Because of C++'s tighter type checking, the use of plain 0, > rather than any suggested NULL macro, leads to fewer problems." Yeah disregard this patch. I came to a similar conclusion after the fact. > > > Best regards, > Antonio.
_______________________________________________ Bug-ddrescue mailing list Bug-ddrescue@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-ddrescue
