Follow-up Comment #5, bug #51506 (project findutils):
> So the specification of such a command line parameter would also be
> a bit too much extra data ...
I heavily doubt that abbreviating the 14 bytes of "-printf '%f\n'"
on the command line to a new action like e.g. -printbase makes _any_
difference in any case (neither in the trivial case with an empty
directory nor when diving into many hundred-thousands of subdirectories).
> ... (besides the internal parsing structures)
> under the view of special efficiency expectations.
Please point to the piece of code which you consider being inefficient.
A patch for a new test case demonstrating the deficiency ("test driven
development") would be much appreciated.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?51506>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
