Follow-up Comment #11, bug #51506 (project findutils):
> I suggest to consider the choice between additional variants for the program
“find”.
I don't think this marginal feature to fall back to basenames for -print
(or when no other action is specified) warrants a separate ~200k binary.
I propose to create a script like this and save as "$HOME/bin/findbasenames"
(or maybe in /usr/local/bin):
#!/bin/sh
exec find "$@" -printf "%f\n"
Have a nice day,
Berny
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?51506>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
