Hi. > How about deleting '5. Another solution'? It's OK.
By the way, what does 'ctags -x --format=2 --gtags' described in `2. Adding a type string to the cross reference format to treat references.' output as the kind name for reference tag? On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 13:32:34 +0900 "Shigio YAMAGUCHI" <[email protected]> wrote: > I understand. > The problem with which blanks concerned is complicated. > I would like to avoid going into detailed arguments from the beginning. > > How about deleting '5. Another solution'? > > I think that it is important to clarity our purpose at first. > We need not show another solution from the beginning. > If the developers of Exuberant Ctags demand another solution, > then we can discuss about it. Please participate in the discussion. -- Hideki IWAMOTO <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Bug-global mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-global
