On 6/11/05, Rod Roark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 10 June 2005 04:44 pm, Joseph Heled wrote: > > On 6/11/05, Rod Roark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > > > XB = (B > 3) ? B - 3 : 0; > > > MWC2 = MWC * (1 - 0.6 * XB / 12); > > > > > > This is probably too simple because we'd also want to > > > consider how the back men are spread among their points. > > > But does this make sense as a general concept? > > > > > > > I can give a definite "I don't know the answer" here. One have to try > > it out and see. My bitter experience says it is fiendishly difficult, > > and would require lots of energy and ingenuity. I don't have the time > > or inclination at this stage to tackle this, unless I can get money > > for trying this ); > > I hear you. I barely have time to worry about it myself, > but it's just irritating to see ParlorBot and the other bots > being so taken advantage of. > > Why don't you tell me where I might plug in such a formula, > and I'll try it out with ParlorBot and perhaps tweak it over > time, hopefully getting some better play from it. We can > worry about rollouts later.
Well you can't just "plug it in" to a running bot. Like I said this needs to be tested and twiked to see if it helps at all - because most likely it will not - certainly not the first tries ... -Joseph > > BTW remember I use "hint 1" to get plays, in case this > matters. > > Cheers, > > -- Rod > _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
