Maximum of 0 may not be overly useful :) On 1/17/09 1:11 PM, "Roy A. Crabtree" <[email protected]> wrote:
> if you put it back, generalize it to a range or selection service (any of > 0-15). > > Cheers. > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Michael Petch <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Chuckle, >> >> I knew about this option because I had seen it years ago. I had done a .14-3 >> build this week, and it happened to be the version I ran (by accident). It >> appears that since .14 this option was actually removed from Gnubg. I ran >> the latest and greatest, and it is gone. >> >> Not sure this was now by accident or if it was removed for a particular >> reason. Someone may have decided that the Egyptian variant was not worth >> keeping in GnuBG. Not sure. >> >> Sorry >> >> >> On 1/17/09 12:52 PM, "Zulli, Louis P" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Mike, >>> >>> No such option in Settings-->Options-->Game in my build using a very recent >>> snapshot. >>> >>> Actually, when I saw Matthias's question, I thought such an option was >>> present, but I couldn't find it. Now I'm confused. >>> >>> Louis >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Michael Petch" <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected], [email protected] >>> Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2009 2:38:38 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern >>> Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] feature request >>> >>> >>> On 1/17/09 9:23 AM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> > is it possible to play gnugb with a maximum of 5 checkers per point (like >>>> in >>>> > the mexican or old english variant)? it's not necessary that the tutorial >>>> will >>>> > work with this option. >>>> > or do you know a bg-software which works with this variant and gives a >>>> similar >>>> > quality as gnubg? >>>> > >>> >>> This option does exist - Launch GnuBG, pull down the "Settings" menu, select >>> "Options...", click on the "Game" tab, then select "Forbid more than 5 >>> checkers on a point". As you already surmised the evaluation engine >>> (Tutorial) doesn't take this option into account - as far as I am aware of. >>> >>> Mike >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bug-gnubg mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg >>> >> >> >> >> Michael Petch >> Quortech Solutions Ltd. >> Cell: (403)804-5700 >> Home: (403)209-1628 >> Off: (403)516-2612 >> >> >> This e-mail is the property of QuorTech Solutions, Inc. and iTechnology >> Customer Service and Support, Inc. and may contain confidential and >> privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any >> review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If >> you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the >> recipient), please contact the sender and delete all copies of the message. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bug-gnubg mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg >> > > Michael Petch Quortech Solutions Ltd. Cell: (403)804-5700 Home: (403)209-1628 Off: (403)516-2612 This e-mail is the property of QuorTech Solutions, Inc. and iTechnology Customer Service and Support, Inc. and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender and delete all copies of the message.
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
