2011/2/11 Christian Anthon <[email protected]>:
> If we could just get rid of our gtk1 legacy I'll be happy.
>
> Christian.

Just a side note:

On http://www.gtk.org/download-windows.html, GTK.org stipulates:

You are welcome to redistribute GTK+ binaries, including applications
that bundle them, on other web sites, CD-ROM, and other media. You
don't have to ask for permission. That's one of the points of Free
Software. One important thing that the GNU licenses require is that
you must also redistribute the source code. This usually means at
least the gettext, GLib, GTK+, Pango and Atk sources.

Does this imply that GNUbg sources also have to include these sources?

N.

>
> 2011/2/10 Øystein Schønning-Johansen <[email protected]>:
>> It's here!
>> -Øystein
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Matthias Clasen <[email protected]>
>> Date: Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:53 PM
>> Subject: GTK+ 3.0.0 released
>> To: [email protected], [email protected],
>> [email protected], [email protected]
>>
>>
>> GTK+ 3.0.0 is now available for download at:
>>
>>  http://download.gnome.org/sources/gtk+/3.0/
>>  ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/3.0/
>>
[snap]

_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

Reply via email to