when running the matches, did you use either -q or --q1 on the command line ??
-Joseph On 19 September 2012 08:10, Philippe Michel <philippe.mich...@sfr.fr> wrote: > On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Joseph Heled wrote: > >> Just in case you are unaware of it, my code does not reflect gnubg >> playing ability per-se, since it uses its own cube decision code. >> Move selection is similar, but not identical either. Nobody ever >> really compared the two approaches. > > > Regarding cube decisions, you have reminded it repeatedly, but I wasn't > aware for the checker play. > > >> Also, just out of curiosity, why do you think 1M is statistically >> significant? > > > 1M is nothing special besides a round number, but 50.19% is about 4 standard > deviations above 50%, isn't it ? _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
