What training approach have you been using, if you don't mind elaborating?
On Jan 14, 2013, at 5:26 PM, Philippe Michel <philippe.mich...@sfr.fr> wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, Stelios Togias wrote: > >> I was just wondering if is GnuBG being actively developed. Not so much as >> in the GUI/program part as in the neural networks part. Is it considered >> mature or there's still training and maybe improvement taking place? > > I have been training new neural nets (with the input features unchanged) for > some time and I'm almost done with it. > > With them, gnubg should get significantly better on average and (as far as I > can see), suffer from few gross regressions in specific positions. It would > most probably still be a little weaker than eXtreme Gammon 2, though. > > I posted a link to intermediate results there : > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2012-09/msg00008.html > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-gnubg mailing list > Bug-gnubg@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
