On 19/06/2013 10:29 PM, Michael Petch wrote: > The reason I ask these questions is that my copy of GNUBG (0.90-mingw > 20121023) has an analysis shows that the only one GNUBG disagreed a bit > with was the 63 and it didn't even rate as doubtful. It had about a > 0.030 error. The rest of the moves the bot agreed with your plays.
I happened to do an analysis after I sent this where it was set to "expert" which uses no look ahead and it shows the errors you suggest for the three moves. Expert is a very low analysis level. I recommend using at a minimum World Class analysis (Settings Menu/Analysis/Analysis Level set to World Class. I would also set eval/tutor mode to "same as analysis" if you use the tutor mode. -- Michael Petch GNU Backgammon Maintainer / Developer OpenPGP FingerPrint=D81C 6A0D 987E 7DA5 3219 6715 466A 2ACE 5CAE 3304 _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
