I personally would not spend time on this minor issue at this point. If you want to save space you can try and train dedicated nets, which might outperform the one-sided approach.
-Joseph On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 08:37, Philippe Michel <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 07:15:05PM -0700, Theodore Hwa wrote: > > > Any comments, suggestions, contributions are appreciated! > > In the comments on the github page you write: > > Note that due to its size, the two-sided bearoff database gnubg_ts0.bd > is currently not packaged. > > Maybe you could package a smaller two-sided database ? The default one > with 6 checkers is 7M but one with only 4 checkers is much smaller > (350k). You can create it with "makebearoff -t 6x4 -f gnubg_ts0.bd". > > If I remember correctly, for some time Russ Allbery had been reluctant > to install it in the Debian port (but the issue was the time that may be > needed to compute it at installation time, not its size per se). > > I suppose that, when these databases were introduced, it has been > studied how the two-sided one improved accuracy over the one-sided one > for various numbers of checkers left. Does anyone has these results ? > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-gnubg mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg >
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
