On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 10:36 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > >> It will be LGPL, since it's based on the glibc one which is LGPL. > ... > > Well, there seem to be a few license problem with the dependencies: > > cycle-check, dirfd, hash, unistd-safer and xalloc are marked as GPL > > only, so the inclusion of FTS using --lgpl will fail. > > Yes, that does complicate things.
Well, you are the maintainer of most of those :-) > > Apart from that, it sound okay, but I can't tell much from a module > > file :-) > > The other files are not hidden :) > They're part of coreutils. I will try by using these. Note that coreutils contain no fts.m4. I will hack one in the meantime. -- Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
