On Mon October 3 2011 15:45:36 Bruno Haible wrote: > In fact, the code already does this, at the beginning of the function > file_has_acl. So in case c) the big compound statement is skipped, and the > function immediately does a "return 0". The patch that you proposed on > 2011-04-06 and committed on 2011-07-22 therefore can only have an effect in > the cases a) and b). In the case b) you have introduced a regression, > that's what you've discovered now. And in the case a) - when the file is > not a symlink: are you saying in <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/720325> that > calling acl_extended_file on a non-symlink will trigger autofs mounts??
Note the bug above has a Fedora sibling with more background included: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/692823 Kamil
