Jim Meyering wrote: > I propose to push Kamil's fix (mainly to have a record of it, > in case we need it later), but then to immediately revert it > along with the file-has-acl.c change that started this. > That seems to be the right thing to do, going forward, > since the kernel folks have recently reverted the behavior > that motivated the earlier file-has-acl.c patch. > Any objections?
Fine with me. > (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720325#c24) Good to see that the kernel people are considering the issue seriously. Thanks, Kamil, for having pulled Ian Kent into the discussion. Bruno -- In memoriam Annalena Tonelli <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annalena_Tonelli>
