https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html recommends listing:
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with Foobar. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. even when using the LGPL, but https://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html doesn't give any recommended usage pattern, and https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.1.html recommends: You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA I know it's a pain to update lgpl-2.1.texi, even if the update is not part of the official license, but it would be nicer if the two recommendations were synced with regards to listing the same address. Am I correct that it is okay to list <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/> as the preferred contact address in the headers of my files, even when using LGPLv2? -- Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature