> I know it's a pain to update lgpl-2.1.texi, I'll ask Brett if there is any prospect of updating the v2 license text.
recommendations were synced with regards to listing the same address. gpl-howto.html is in sync with v3. I guess it could at least explicitly say that it is ok to use the url formulation with v2. > Am I correct that it is okay to list <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/> as > the preferred contact address in the headers of my files, even when > using LGPLv2? Yes, it is ok. k