Pavel Cahyna wrote: > Perhaps you could start by providing > some commits to analyze (some of them that contain known regressions, > some of them that don't - without indicating which one is which) to have > a smaller set than e.g. all commits since 2026-01-01?
Makes sense. Try these commits: 6aae65332edc58970c0dc287b28c8f1f6250282a 17dc60e624cd6fc3491f9cb002f760d60e66ce8b 53d4558960659ba7c4e9e2757bfb0977a5027fae f6894c646a4f2f544209faf8ecb57ba64d9b8238 I guess that in the beginning, the analyses will show many false alarms and few good reports. The art will be to improve this ratio over time, by incorporating gnulib specific rules in the prompt(s). Bruno
