Hi, On 6/5/26 17:03, Pavel Cahyna wrote:
Here are the findings:
...
The results look great!Do you mind providing details about which provider/model and which prompt(s) you were using?
In general, I am very interested in using LLMs to improve code quality.So far I had great success in reviewing MRs / PRs with different Gemini and Claude models. But it quickly gets expensive, so I switched using Qwen3.6-35B on my local development machine (AMD M780), used with the `pi` agent. It's slow and quality is lower (but not too bad) in comparison to high-end paid models.
It found two buffer overflows in the good ol' whois utility.On Gitlab, gnulib has the Ultimate tier, which allows us to use instances with a couple of CPU cores and RAM - maybe enough to run the the LLM on CPU only.
Just mentioning this as an optional alternative to external models. Regards, Tim
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
