Follow-up Comment #20, bug #34490 (project gnustep): i am a bit puzzled about the resistance since any changes in my patch are only for a fallback where the current code path doesn't work at all. please keep in mind that *anything* that calls "xdg-open" is a infinite improvement over what you have now, since the current code doesn't do anything useful at all outside a (hypothetical) gnustep-environment.
i'm not sure how anything can be gained here with wrapping the call to ShellExectureW() in an standalone tool...whats the improvement there? _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?34490> _______________________________________________ Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/ _______________________________________________ Bug-gnustep mailing list Bug-gnustep@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep