Follow-up Comment #12, bug #63827 (project groff): [comment #11 comment #11:] > [comment #10 comment #10:] > > Should the 1.23 announcement/news mention that: > > * the pdfmark bundled with this release of groff is not the latest code (and provide a pointer to that code)? > > I don't think they've diverged all that much. ... Sorry, but I beg to differ. Since I forked it, I have added quite a significant amount of new content to pdfmark.ms, (and hence to pdfmark.pdf). I've also improved, and sometimes corrected, a few features of pdfroff.sh operation, corrected some issues which I've identified in pdfmark.tmac, and added the new toc.tmac facility, to improve table of contents generation capabilities.
I no longer maintain a free-standing ChangeLog file, within my repository, but can generate one on demand, from the mercurial log; I've attached a copy of that, spanning the period from the time of the fork, up to the latest published commit, from which you should be able to glean some idea of the changes I've already published. In addition to my published changes, I have a queue of some 16 local patches, yet to be finalized, but I anticipate fairly imminent publication of several of them. (file #54446) _______________________________________________________ Additional Item Attachment: File name: ChangeLog Size:17 KB <https://file.savannah.gnu.org/file/ChangeLog?file_id=54446> _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63827> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/