Follow-up Comment #26, bug #64155 (group groff):
I guess I wasn't clear enough when I advised not implementing .fam checking as
proposed by Branden, as I have just discovered the change has been committed,
with the expected consequence: partial families in my library that have only R
and I fonts choke on .fam.
printf ".fam Technical\n.ft R" | groff -z
troff:<standard input>:1: error: 'Technical' is not a valid font family
This is a regression. Please revert the commit that introduced it,
39ffa368dc6a1de4c11cf3f4f5b8594d3c974173. I don't see any need for .fam
checking in the first place, but that discussion should be left for after the
commit is reverted.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64155>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/