Follow-up Comment #31, bug #64155 (group groff):
[comment #27 comment #27:]
> it would be good to know if/how Dave's original report in
> comment #0 was invalid.
I'm fine with -fZD failing on the grounds that groff doesn't consider ZD a
family, but the failure mechanism should be cleaner.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64155>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
