Follow-up Comment #39, bug #64155 (group groff): Self-followup:
[comment #37 comment #37:]
> in a way back compatible to almost any older troff.
Obviously, this specific example is not AT&T-portable due to the long names,
but the logic can be written portably.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64155>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
