Follow-up Comment #24, bug #65099 (group groff): In comment 8 to bug #67509, Deri said, regarding a performance regression issue being tracked in bug #67602:
> Although this job (on bleeding edge) has a 10x slowdown, it is very
> much dependent on the size of the lookup table and the number of
> lookups which fail, this job is not typical[.]
> ...
> So I think we can live with it for this release, and you can take the
> flak if someone else is using groff for monster jobs.
I think Deri's right. Dropping dep on bug #67602.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65099>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
