Follow-up Comment #28, bug #65099 (group groff):

[comment #27 comment #27:]
> which we regard as needing resolution for us to be satisfied
> with the 1.24 release.

I suggest that bug #66803, being a regression (albeit a documentation one),
fits that criterion.


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65099>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to