Follow-up Comment #4, bug #68216 (group groff): [comment #3 comentario nº3:] > [comment #2 comment #2:] >> given the lack of additional feedback, and in order to close the issue, I >> believe you may do the following. >> >> 1. keep the current hyphenation patterns, if they don't clog groff's memory >> (i don't know if there is a test suite to run a benchmark test). > > No, but an ad hoc test suggests that any difference from loading, say, > English hyphenation patterns is negligible. > >
ok: that means that there may not be penalty for the large hpf, so hyphen.es
may stay as it is...
>
>> 2. keep the approved changes by Eloi, and push the patch to close the
>> issue.
>>
>> I may fix the patch to keep Eloi's approved changes, if required.
>
> I don't have much feedback as I'm not a native Spanish speaker.
>
> However I'm aware of this issue and my intention is to address it for the
> _groff_ 1.25.0 release, planned for early July. For the moment my focus is
> on the formatter, as I want to get my fingers *out* of it before chilling the
> development temperature as release time gets closer.
I'll do the following: I'll make the corrections approved by Eloi in the other
thread and remove my suggestions, and provide a diff file correcting only the
clear misspellings to have it ready for the next bugfix or main release, to
let you decide when to release.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?68216>
_______________________________________________
Mensaje enviado vía Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
