Follow-up Comment #5, bug #68284 (group groff): At 2026-04-27T18:04:14-0400, Dave wrote: > Follow-up Comment #4, bug #68284 (group groff): > > Ah, that makes sense. But that info does not seem easily discoverable > to someone merely looking up ".O" in the manual.
Conceded. In other respects we seem to follow, in our Texinfo manual,
a practice of laying out every "official" detail about a request,
register, or escape sequence that there is to document.
And it doesn't seem, four or so years later, to be all that costly in
proportional word count to find a place to stick the word "read-only"
back in where applicable.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?68284>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
