Follow-up Comment #6, bug #68284 (group groff): [comment #5 comment #5:] > And it doesn't seem, four or so years later, to be all that > costly in proportional word count to find a place to stick the > word "read-only" back in where applicable.
This documentation issue has been punted to bug #68287.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?68284>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
