Follow-up Comment #3, bug #68329 (group groff):
[comment #2 comment #2:]
> One advantage to a historical tree cited in that thread is that it is
> advertised as something that can be destroyed and re-created as necessary
> when new data comes to light. So a good-enough snapshot of a release is fine
> as a placeholder until something more authenticatable comes along.
Good point. Maybe I should have reviewed the thread before commenting. ;-)
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?68329>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
