>>>>> "OY" == OKUJI Yoshinori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
OY> If you send the description for the specification, I'll add
OY> it. Have you decided the format?
No. I will have to think a while about this. I'll send a diff for you
later this week. Do you think it will make it for 0.7?
BTW, I really think we should make the Multiboot standard more easily
extendible. Do you know the concept of Tag Items? It is used a lot in
the IP protocol, for example. The idea is that each item in the
structure looks something like this:
struct item
{
int tag;
int length
void data[length];
}
This makes the data structure it a little more difficult to parse and
create, but the flexibility makes it worthwhile IMO. The downfall in
this case is that it breaks the compatibility with existing
systems. But I think the advantage is so big that it's worth it. What
do you think?
