On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
> So I have checked in my own patch to fix the "different LMA and VMA"
> problem. I think my patch is better than Rogelio's, because mine
> checks if a memory segment contains the entry address, instead of just
> choosing the first one, and mine doesn't increase global variables at
> all. But I haven't tested it yet. If you have a Multiboot OS image
> which has different LMA and VMA, check if the code works well, and
> report the result to this list, if there is anything wrong.
>
> Okuji
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-grub mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
>
Ok. My kernel has a different lma and vma. way different. i will test your
patch.
_______________________________________________
Bug-grub mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
