On Monday 26 July 2004 08:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I understand you want to spend more time on GRUB2, and I suppose that > in and of itself is a Good Thing. However, myself and others (by read > others' reactions) are still somewhat/heavily dependent on the > existing GRUB to get by on a daily basis, and I fear many folks would > be disappointed if it's left to bitrot.
I understand. I myself also depend on GRUB Legacy for my own use. That's why I keep the maintenance of GRUB Legacy ongoing at some degree. But if you really want to use GRUB Legacy, please consider contributing to GRUB Legacy. IMHO, GRUB should be supported by more community effort rather than by a very few people who feel responsibility. Note that GRUB is open to everyone, since it is Free Software, right? > So... Could you give us a brief update on the state of GRUB2? Do you > encourage selected subset of the grub users to switch? Where's it > heading? At what speed? I'm more that ok with dumping grub, iff grub2 > turns up to be a viable alternative... I don't recommend switching to GRUB 2 at the moment, if you just intend to utilize GRUB. GRUB 2 is still only for developers who want a better implementation of GRUB. I want to aim at making GRUB 2 usable for ordinary users as the main goal of my work by reducing the workload on GRUB Legacy. I'm sure that it will take 3 months or more. Okuji _______________________________________________ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
