On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 10:26:56AM -0600, Christopher Allan Webber wrote: > If the @ is for the optional choice of including a version, I'm good > with it. It does mean we can never have @ in our package names, but > that might be a good restriction anyway :)
According to the packaging guidelines, package names should only contain lower-case letters, digits and "-" (the formulation is a bit ambiguous, but this is the intent). So any choice of separators apart from "-" should be fine, and we can happily bikeshed! Andreas
