Ludovic Courtès (2016-04-19 13:50 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès (2016-04-18 20:41 +0300) wrote: >> >>> It seems to me that this bug has no clear purpose, or too broad a >>> purpose, or something. >>> >>> Could you retitle it, or close it, or fix it, whichever is appropriate? >>> :-) >> >> Was it for me? > > ‘To whom it may concern’. :-) > >> I think the main purpose of this report was to tell us that "edit" >> name is confusing. So I would retitle it to "Rename 'guix edit' as it >> is confusing". But I don't know how; can it be done by sending some >> control message? > > Yes, using the ‘retitle’ command, described somewhere at > <http://debbugs.gnu.org/Developer.html>.
Sorry, I don't see any mention of 'retitle' there, also I don't find retitle control message while using emacs-debbugs package. > However, I think (1) the title should describe the bug, not the > solution, and (2) ‘guix edit’ does what it says IMO, even if it can > occasionally stumble upon read-only files. OK, well I don't know what to do with it then. What about the following title: «"guix edit" name may be confusing»? -- Alex
