Ludovic Courtès (2016-06-02 22:40 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès (2016-04-20 18:31 +0300) wrote: > > [...] > >>>>> However, I think (1) the title should describe the bug, not the >>>>> solution, and (2) ‘guix edit’ does what it says IMO, even if it can >>>>> occasionally stumble upon read-only files. >>>> >>>> OK, well I don't know what to do with it then. What about the following >>>> title: «"guix edit" name may be confusing»? >>> >>> Perfect! :-) >> >> Done. > > I’m rather inclined to close this bug as ‘wontfix’. Thoughts?
I would prefer it to be solved by renaming "guix edit" to "guix package definition", but I think it will not be welcomed by most users and authors, so 'wontfix' is fine by me. -- Alex
