Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> writes: > I'm guessing the i386 does something bogus? Your x86_64 is already able > to run i386 code natively, AFAIK.
Alright, this was my interpretation from the manual and available architectures that I just plugged it all together like that. I wasn't aware that x86_64 can run i386 natively. > The binfmt service type registers binary formats of non-native > architectures with interpreters to run them [0]; this way, when an ARM > binary is encountered on a x86_64 system, the kernel Linux knows to > launch it via QEMU, for example. Since commit > 77c2f4e2068ebec3f384c826c5a99785125ff72c, this is in effect for any > container (it used to be possible to enable it with (guix-support? #t) > on only for the container spawned by guix-daemon. I reenabled the service without it mentioning i386. Building Guix passes as expected. Thank you. Kind regards, Simon
