Hello Simon, Simon Streit <si...@netpanic.org> writes:
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> writes: >> I'm guessing the i386 does something bogus? Your x86_64 is already able >> to run i386 code natively, AFAIK. > > Alright, this was my interpretation from the manual and available > architectures that I just plugged it all together like that. I wasn't > aware that x86_64 can run i386 natively. > >> The binfmt service type registers binary formats of non-native >> architectures with interpreters to run them [0]; this way, when an ARM >> binary is encountered on a x86_64 system, the kernel Linux knows to >> launch it via QEMU, for example. Since commit >> 77c2f4e2068ebec3f384c826c5a99785125ff72c, this is in effect for any >> container (it used to be possible to enable it with (guix-support? #t) >> on only for the container spawned by guix-daemon. > > I reenabled the service without it mentioning i386. Building Guix > passes as expected. Thank you. No worries. Thank you for the update. Closing. Maxim
