Hi Maxime, Maxime Devos <maxime.de...@student.kuleuven.be> writes:
> (define o (make-unstructured-octal 0 (make-zero-string "0" "䤄"))) > (unless (valid-octal? o) (error "oops")) > (test-equal "Writing is reversible (#57573)" > o (decode-octal (encode-octal o))) Right. That unstructured octal should be invalid. By the definition in the code, it has too much “structure”. It’s a test issue, the actual code is fine. I’ll patch the tests and make a point release in the coming days. Thanks for the heads up and the analysis, and sorry for the inconvenience! -- Tim P.S. I’m excited about antioxidant – good work and happy hacking!
