Justus Winter, le Thu 29 Aug 2013 12:22:30 +0200, a écrit : > Quoting Samuel Thibault (2013-08-28 23:30:27) > > Applied this one, thanks. > > This one as in the private header file?
Yes. > I've come across an issue with the header being private. This means > that neither procfs (being maintained and compileable out-of-tree) nor > the glibc can use the symbolic names. I'd be very reluctant to expose such kind of information statically. Does procfs really need this information? As for glibc, I know it needs it at least for reboot(), but I'd rather not give the information through a static macro. Samuel
