Quoting Samuel Thibault (2013-08-29 12:28:34) > Justus Winter, le Thu 29 Aug 2013 12:22:30 +0200, a écrit : > > Quoting Samuel Thibault (2013-08-28 23:30:27) > > > Applied this one, thanks. > > > > This one as in the private header file? > > Yes. > > > I've come across an issue with the header being private. This means > > that neither procfs (being maintained and compileable out-of-tree) nor > > the glibc can use the symbolic names. > > I'd be very reluctant to expose such kind of information statically.
Agreed, but > Does procfs really need this information? Kinda. main.c (main) reads: > opt_kernel_pid = 2; Ugh. > As for glibc, I know it needs > it at least for reboot(), but I'd rather not give the information > through a static macro. This particular case could indeed be handled more elegantly by looking up the port using /servers/startup as discussed somewhere (irc?). Justus