Hi
This is me being picky about a corner case :-)
2015-07-22 19:42 GMT-03:00 James Clarke <jrt...@jrtc27.com>:
> +error_t
> +inhibit_ext2_pager (void)
> +{
> + error_t err;
> +
> + /* The file pager can rely on the disk pager, so inhibit the file
> + pager first. */
> +
> + err = pager_inhibit_workers (file_pager_requests);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + err = pager_inhibit_workers (diskfs_disk_pager_requests);
> + return err;
> +}
It looks like the file pager workers will remain inhibited if the
'pager_inhibit_workers' function
fails to inhibit the disk pager. fatfs is affected by this problem too.
Should a call to 'pager_resume_workers' be inserted before returning
in case of error?
Regards
