Perhaps; I was following what diskfs_remount does when inhibiting RPCs, which
stay inhibited on error.
James
> On 23 Jul 2015, at 00:51, Diego Nieto Cid <dnie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> This is me being picky about a corner case :-)
>
> 2015-07-22 19:42 GMT-03:00 James Clarke <jrt...@jrtc27.com>:
>> +error_t
>> +inhibit_ext2_pager (void)
>> +{
>> + error_t err;
>> +
>> + /* The file pager can rely on the disk pager, so inhibit the file
>> + pager first. */
>> +
>> + err = pager_inhibit_workers (file_pager_requests);
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + err = pager_inhibit_workers (diskfs_disk_pager_requests);
>> + return err;
>> +}
>
> It looks like the file pager workers will remain inhibited if the
> 'pager_inhibit_workers' function
> fails to inhibit the disk pager. fatfs is affected by this problem too.
>
> Should a call to 'pager_resume_workers' be inserted before returning
> in case of error?
>
> Regards
