March 8, 2026 at 9:42 PM, "NexusSfan" <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]?to=%22NexusSfan%22%20%3Cnexussfan%40seznam.cz%3E > wrote:
> > On 3/8/26 6:23 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > Getting data on gnu.hurd.org is not cumbersome because of the cvs commit > > (that's not more difficult than a git commit), but because publishing on > > gnu.hurd.org means endorsing the content, which I haven't taken the time > > to do in the past few years. How does one get the content endorsed? Do we email the FSF ? > > Also, it seems that ./render_locally has some rendering troubles, for > > instance faq.html reads: > > > Note: the most up-to-date version version of this FAQ is available on > > [darnassus](http://darnassus.sceen.net/~hurd-web/faq/>) > > This page <a href="./faq_inlined.html">with all items inlined</a>. > > # General-discussion FAQs > > The darnassus URL hasn't been turned into html, and the title hasn't > > been turned into html either, while the faq_inlined line did get turn > > into html. Help welcome on this, I'm running ikiwiki 3.20260201-3 > > > Earlier today I took the time to update at least the main pages, notably > > the faq. Don't hesitate to tell me if some page should really be > > updated. > > The really good point about darnassus is getting the hurd wiki hosted by > > a hurd system. It has been successful for more than a decade, but > > nowadays with all the bots it's more difficult :/ Ideally things like > > > I like that the Hurd wiki is on Hurd. Does OpenBSD use NetBSD for their docs? > Does FreeBSD use Linux for their docs? I think we all agree on this point! Also I believe a former Hurd developer kindly hosts darnassus: https://www.sceen.net/gnuhurd/ Thank you Richard Braun! > > > > iocaine could be used, but as usual with all the recent tools, they > > depend on dozens of libraries which have the tendency of depending on > > only very standard setups (x86_64 linux). Iocaine does build after some > > fixups, but it fails to start on i386-hurd: > > thread 'main' (1) panicked at > > /home/buildd/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-1949cf8c6b5b557f/roto-0.9.0/src/codegen/mod.rs:298:44: > > called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: "unsupported architecture" > > apparently because cranelift, used by roto, doesn't support i386, only > > x86_64. Perhaps there is some way to tell roto or cranelift to use a > > > No, still fails on an x86_64 hurd machine, I've tried it. > > > > > more generic backend rather than an arch-specific backend, their readmes > > don't say. > > Samuel > > > -- NexusSfan > GNU.org - Please support free software. I'm assuming that using Anubis would be much harder than Iocaine ...?
