On 20 June 2026 17:05:02 BST, [email protected] wrote: >June 20, 2026 at 4:58 AM, "Bradley Morgan" <[email protected] >mailto:[email protected]?to=%22Bradley%20Morgan%22%20%3Cinclude%40grrlz.net%3E >> wrote: > > > >> >> On June 20, 2026 1:11:13 AM GMT+01:00, [email protected] wrote: >> >> > >> > June 19, 2026 at 6:05 PM, "Bradley Morgan" <[email protected] >> > >mailto:[email protected]?to=%22Bradley%20Morgan%22%20%3Cinclude%40grrlz.net%3E >> > >> > > >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > On June 19, 2026 11:02:03 PM GMT+01:00, Paulo Duarte >> > > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On 19 Jun 2026, at 22:50, Bradley Morgan <[email protected]> >wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > Good that sergey did it (atleast some) :) >> > > > > >> > > > He did 95% of the work. >> > > > >> > > Oh. Well, could we make some sort of telegram group? Or are you >folks >> > > >> > not >> > >> > > >> > > into telegram.. :( >> > > >> > I would imagine that most people are not into that in the Hurd group, >but >> > some >> > might be ok with it. I personally don't like that it is routed on a >> > central >> > server... >> > >> > There is always #hurd irc channel. >> > >> > XMPP (jabber) supports public rooms (maybe private ones). JMP.chat >> > >> > Mumble voice chat would be an option. >> > >> > I am a member of the FSF, and they support jitsi chatrooms (audio / >> > video). >> > >> Sorry to be so nitpicky here, but I don't like the UI on irc (on mobile) >> I prefer to do my informal chats and stuff on mobile. >> >> Telegram has a Amazing UI tbh, and it's more privacy focused then e.g: >> discord >> >> I'm suggesting it because then I can chat where I pretty much always >talk >> to people, I mean, I have mastodon too. > >No need to apologize. You are not nickpicking. You are just describing >what >you want. :) > >I believe that matrix is a more libre option for the Hurd, and they do >have mobile >clients. Riot is one. Maybe next week I'll re-set up my matrix client... > >Unless, I can set up dino-im to bridge to matrix...should be possible. > >Are you sure that you don't want to try XMPP? We can create private / >public chat >rooms. And jmp.chat has a android client. cheogram: >https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.cheogram.android/ >which is based on the "conversations" XMPP client. Both work splendidly >in mobile. > > >P.S. hmmmm, well I actually am trying a fun experiment. For at least a >week the only >computer that I will use is the Hurd running on real hardware...does the >Hurd support >a telagram client?
Port it! It's a debian application They also have a web client >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Are you a ARM folk too? >> > > > > >> > > > An enthusiast, not an ARM system developer though. Did it for >quite >> > > > some time for i686 and x86_64, but got so many years working with >> > > > business applications with high level languages that started >really >> > > > missing the low-level C stuff. >> > > > >> > > > I daily drive in a M4 MacBook, have a few Raspberry Pis and a few >> > > >> > other >> > >> > > >> > > > ARM SoCs. But my ultimate goal is to have it booting on an old M1 >Mac >> > > > Mini, even if just via serial TTY. >> > > > >> > > Could we get it booting starting off on u-boot? If we modify the >code to >> > > allow hurd to work, because currently it only supports Linux >loading >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Perhaps if we are lucky ;) we could get arm.com folks to work >on >> > > >> > hurd. >> > >> > > >> > > > > but we may not be lucky :( >> > > > > >> > > > That would be great. >> > > > >> > > If anyone that knows arm.com people sees this thread, get their >> > > attention, please. >> > > >> > > If you told me how id get their attention, id surely push it a try. >> > > >> > I sometimes give puri.sm a suggestion (business idea). You could try >to >> > convince them >> > to port their Librem 5 to the Hurd. I own such a device. The librem 5 >> > supports >> > a virtual serial console via USB... >> > >> > [email protected] mailto:[email protected] >> > >> Intriguing, I'm into arm.com people >> more, but I'm sure we can do that, for them to think about it, what >> we need to do is make them realize >> the benefits of porting their machine/chipset to the hurd. >> >> They won't just do it for no reason.. > >I already sent them an email saying that they should support the Hurd. > >Also the librem 5 supports a hardware serial too! > >> >> (Same with the arm.com folks tbf) >> >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks! >> > > Thanks!
