> Richard, would it be OK if we license libroute under GPLv3+? LGPLv3+, isn't it?
> rishi, do you have the email address of the maintainer for libnl? Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > They consider this a worthwhile endeavour. NetworkManager would > need a portable libifconfig if it is to become completely > portable. I am not yet working on libifconfig, but I believe > Inetutils can provide that. Our current ifconfig implementation > can be suitable reworked with libnl (ie. PF_NETLINK actually) on > Linux and PF_ROUTE on *BSDs to achieve this. I have read these > methods are better than the older ioctl ways of doing things and > the respective kernel people prefer them. > > That sounds interesting. Could you post a proposal on how this might > look? About libifconfig? Regards, Debarshi
